Thursday, January 10, 2008

Barack, Hillary, Black America, and The White (Wo)Man's Colder Ice


[Bear with me here. I'll ramble a bit, but there's a point.]

An often noted criticism, whether in the blogosphere, black talk radio, cable news, or the barbershop, is that some black folks are hesitant to vote for Barack Obama because they don't feel he's "addressed specific issues of interest to black people/black women", and that this is cause for skepticism. I guess I could buy this argument if those very same people could effectively articulate the "issues" that Obama's competitors have addressed. When you ask this question of those same folks, you either will get Standard Negro Excuse™ #271 ("What's that got to do with anything? Answer MY question!") or a meritless defense of another candidate ("Bill Clinton was the first black President anyway."). Both responses smell like ass to me, especially when it's so much easier to search for the answers to these questions with a simple Google search, as opposed to being lazy and expecting Obama, or any candidate, to come to your house and explain their stances over DiGiorno Pizza. Not that that would be a bad thing. I love DiGiorno Pizza. Cause, you know, it's not delivery, it's DiGiorno.

Just in case you're interested in what Obama's done, or is planning on doing for black America, you simply need to visit the thorough but nonthreatening well organized Civil Rights section of the official Obama website. Everything you need to know about the candidate's stances on issues pertinent to black America is right there, spelled out in layman's terms for people who need to be spoonfed. I'm not going to bother doing all the legwork for you when all you need to do is click the friggin' link that follows this post and read for yourself, but here's a few highlights of Barry's Plan To Save Black America™. In his words, not mine.
GENDER PAY INEQUITY

For every $1.00 earned by a man, the average woman receives only 77 cents, while African American women only get 67 cents and Latinas receive only 57 cents. Obama will work to overturn the Supreme Court's recent ruling that curtails racial minorities' and women's ability to challenge pay discrimination. Obama will also pass the Fair Pay Act to ensure that women receive equal pay for equal work.

HATE CRIMES

The number of hate crimes increased nearly 8 percent to 7,700 incidents in 2006. Obama will strengthen federal hate crimes legislation and reinvigorate enforcement at the Department of Justice's Criminal Section.

UNEQUAL JUSTICE SYSTEM

African Americans and Hispanics are more than twice as likely as whites to be searched, arrested, or subdued with force when stopped by police. Disparities in drug sentencing laws, like the differential treatment of crack as opposed to powder cocaine, are unfair. Obama will ban racial profiling by federal law enforcement agencies and provide federal incentives to state and local police departments to prohibit the practice.

FIXIN' UP DA' HOOD

Obama will create 20 Promise Neighborhoods in areas that have high levels of poverty and crime and low levels of student academic achievement in cities across the nation. The Promise Neighborhoods will be modeled after the Harlem Children's Zone, which provides a full network of services, including early childhood education, youth violence prevention efforts and after-school activities, to an entire neighborhood from birth to college.

PROMOTING FATHERHOOD

Obama will sign into law his Responsible Fatherhood and Healthy Families Act to remove some of the government penalties on married families, crack down on men avoiding child support payments, and ensure that payments go to families instead of state bureaucracies.

OBAMA'S TRACK RECORD IN ILLINOIS

Obama has worked to promote civil rights and fairness in the criminal justice system throughout his career. As a community organizer, Obama helped 150,000 African Americans register to vote. As a civil rights lawyer, Obama litigated employment discrimination, housing discrimination, and voting rights cases. As a State Senator, Obama passed one of the country's first racial profiling law and helped reform a broken death penalty system. And in the U.S. Senate, Obama has been a leading advocate for protecting the right to vote, helping to reauthorize the Voting Rights Act and leading the opposition against discriminatory barriers to voting.

THE ACHIEVEMENT GAP

Obama's "STEP UP" plan addresses the achievement gap by supporting summer learning opportunities for disadvantaged children through partnerships between local schools and community organizations.

PREDATORY LENDING

The FBI is predicting that mortgage fraud may become a criminal epidemic. In these elaborate schemes, criminals use identity theft or face-to-face scams to gain control of victims' homes. The offenders then apply for hefty mortgage loans, take the cash, then disappear, robbing homeowners of their property and threatening the financial health of the most vulnerable members of society. Senator Obama introduced the first federal bill to combat mortgage fraud. The STOP FRAUD Act criminalizes mortgage fraud, authorizes $10 million more for anti-mortgage fraud programs and requires the FBI to update bankers on fraudulent activity in a formal, systematic way. The bill also would authorize increased federal funding for mortgage counseling.
Conspicuously absent, but probably just well hidden: Crime. There was lots of stuff about combating recidivism rates by offering ex-cons more job training, but nothing specifically about reducing murders, etc. Again, I'm sure his stances on this issue are out there, I just couldn't locate them on his website.

Either way you dice it, the issues have been well defined. Just because he doesn't bring them up frequently in debates doesn't mean he is not concerned with the issues of Black America, and by extension, America.

Speaking of which, the whole "what's he gonna do for us?" angle is getting real tired. Let's not forget, Obama is running for President of the United States, not President of Compton. Black people are barely 12% of the US population nowadays, so expecting him to cater to us and only us is not just delusional, it's dangerous.

Black people, perhaps more so than anyone other ethnic group, are notorious for waiting for a Messiah as opposed to rolling up their sleeves and doing some actual work. No President is going to completely solve black on black crime, just as no President can solve the issues of black student underachievement, the disappearing black nuclear family, or out of wedlock births. Our problems are just that. Ours. We didn't create all of them, but it's counterproductive to expect someone, anyone, else to fix them.

[Editor's Note: AB.com advocates working with kids in whatever capacity you find most comfortable; be it coaching, mentoring or tutoring, because I think most adults, and for that matter, teens, are already effed' the eff' up and thus a lost cause. If a person doesn't have it figured out by age 18, chances are they're doomed to a life of idiocy. Getting BET off the air, or outlawing rap music won't fix any of that. Simply put, if you're not doing something, anything, to directly improve your community, then please, have a Coke and a smile, and you know the rest. Man up, woman up, and help someone other than yourself! Take the AverageBro Challenge™, or do us all a favor and H.S.D.!!!]

What angers me is the slave-like mentality with which some black people judge Obama. While it's fair to expect a black man to bring a different sensibility to the Oval office, I think it's borderline self-hate to question his dedication to certain issues when you wouldn't ask the same of the other candidates. This, to me, is the embodiment of "the white man's ice being colder".

[Editor's Note: Yeah, I know dry ice is technically colder than regular ice, but don't let semantics get in the way of my point.]

Nobody is saying you should vote for Obama "just cause' he's black". That's the definition of idiocy. But equally idiotic is not voting for him "just cause' he's black" without bothering to know what he advocates and pretending he doesn't have any official stance just because you haven't heard a 10 second soundbite on your local news. Wake up, and stop depending on barbershop word of mouth to educate you on everything!

I'm all for being an informed voter, thus the crapload of links that follow. But if you're going to be lazy and not do the very basic research to inform yourself about each candidate and what they stand for, yet for some reason think it's ok to expect more of one candidate than others, then you my friend are just downright triflin'. Please do as all a favor on November 4th and stay your dumb ass at home playing PS3 and watching Judge Mathis. I don't need your dumb vote cancelling out mine.

Shit, where are poll taxes and literacy tests when you really need em'!!?!? Damned Jim Crow Laws!!!!

I'll step off my box of Lever 2000, but if you're still unsure of where each candidate stands, please take 10 minutes to peruse their sites and get familiar. But please, whatever you do, don't pretend that candidates haven't directly addressed issues of interest to Black America. They all have.

Just because you haven't heard about it, doesn't mean it hasn't been said.

Question: Have you heard other people using this "he ain't said nothin' bout' helpin' black folks" line of reasoning for not supporting Obama? How do you typically respond to this slave mentality?


Barack Obama's Issues Section on BarackObama.com

Hillary's Clinton's Issues Section on HillaryClinton.com

John Edwards Issues Section on JohnEdwards.com

30 AverageComments™:

Bellini said...

well done, i'm loving the satire. we have to take baby steps with folks -- it's an unfortunate, but that's their learning curve @ the present time. check out my post yesterday; Checkmate! (www.5andapossible.blogspot.com)

Gunfighter said...

Well done.

Gunfighter said...

Well done.

hawa said...

Double standard. White folks don't have to promise a thing, but a Black man better promise the world on a platter.

I'm happy to support a candidate who addresses socioeconomics at the national level, which stands at the root of "black" problems.

Although I'm 99.9% likely to vote Democrat this year (Obama 08), I have a close eye on Republican candidate Ron Paul, who seems to have the best position on major socioeconomic issues. (After you get past the blather that he's a racist)...

Latoya Peterson said...

I live in DC. I have yet to hear anyone in real life say that they wouldn't vote for Obama because they don't know where he stands on the issues.

I have heard - it's too early to decide. I have heard that voting is a crock and they don't believe in it. But luckily, I haven't had to deal with that one yet.

Cube said...

Preach! Chuuuch! Tabernacle!

I am cut and pasting this into an email and sending to my whole mailing list. I would suggest others do the same, especially if you know folks in SC.

Trey said...

Damn, aint that the truth! Well stated.

JerseyBred said...

Thank you.

I swear it is internalized hatred that keeps these Blk Obama skeptics & cynics ticking.

Anonymous said...

What also pisses me off is when people say they are "still undecided". How the hell can you be undecided? The candidates have had the same stances and bios for over a year now. Nothing has changed. Another BS excuse.

I just saw 2 south carolina preachers on CNN talking about they are undecided. Negroes please. You are just weighting which candidate is going to do you the most favors.

Wake up people!

Tam Tam said...

AverageBro...

Thank you
Thank you
Thank you

You have articulated what I've been thinking about for the last 5 months.

zackattack said...

Well, I am a 23 year old black male who IS one of Senator Obama's constituents. So, I get real pissed off when people who don't live in Illinois try to judge our displeasure with his work. (No offense).

He's not a bad guy, he's just a lazy guy. I live in a tough neighborhood in Chicago, and he's done nothing in almost 4 years. It's not about what his platform is, but rather if his platform has some background to it. It doesn't.

I understand that Senators can't do as much as aldermen, so don't go there with me. But I'm doing the best I can to inspire other black males. I just need some help from the Senate. But wait....our black senator is too busy running for president!!!!!

So don't stereotype all black people because you are in love with the media's portrayal of him.
We need a Black President, but not him right now. He needs to start being a good senator first.

ebw-educated black woman said...

AB, again you've done a great job in articulating what many of us are feeling. Zackattack, I hear you..wish I had more concrete evidence of what you're saying....
However, I'm sure the senator is trying. I'll give him the benefit of the doubt. Especially since I've heard nothing but praise about him from my peeps in the Chi.
Anyway, AB I was just having this converstion with my baby cousin (a poli-sci major). The thing that really burns me up is when I hear these the same folk you refer to in your post talking about eveything Bill Clinton did for black folks. Can someone please tell me what these great and wonderful acts were? Seriously. I was kinda busy getting an edducation and working 3 jobs to pay for it in the nineties,so I'm sure I missed alot.When I ask these "folk" to tell me what Bill did for blacks specifically, that he didn't do for any one else, they never have an answer. Maybe some of your regular readers or you, AB can help me.

cinco said...

Thanks AB!

It pisses me off to hear people make a statement and then they can't back it up. I've yet to read how 'Hiliary' or 'John' have helped 'Blacks'...because people hold 'Barack' to a different level of expectations. If you don't want to vote for Barack- don't. Just save all the crap about his lack of experience (as if 20-30 years in the Senate is consoling). There haven't been to
Many presidents who've had prior experience as a president. One could look @ 'Bill' and see that a 2nd term didn't make him any wiser in his decision making...

zackattack said...

Once again, black folks don't respect each other's opinions.

Whenever one person feels otherwise, the mob attacks.

This is the REAL REASON why Obama won't win. We put each other down more than him.

ebw-educated black woman said...

zackattack, no one is putting you down. In fact, I rather like the fact that you, as one of Senator Obama's constiuents, have information on which to base your decision. The point of AB's comments is that there is a majority of black folks that don't have any basis for making comments on "what Obabma has done or is going to do for blacks". The difference between you and these people is you are making an informed decision. Now, I'm sure AB is not trying to generalize and put all of us in the same pot...but, let's face it, there are a large amount of "us" that are too lazy to do our homework, and will accept anything that the media spins our way. Hence,IMO, the ignorant people who run around calling Bill Clinton, the first black president. Personally, as an African-American (or black, whichever PC term we're using this year) I am offended. Let's not forget that Bill Clinton was proven to be a boldface LIAR. (I did not have sex with that woman...remember that?) Well, if he's the first black president, did that make Hill the first black First Lady? As a woman, I feel like she couldn't keep her house in order, so why should I trust her to keep the White House in order? (The WASPs in my office had a field day with that, interpreting it to mean that black men are cheating liars, and black women are willing to put up with such nonsense. Again, the spin.) In my mind, I feel like giving Bill an honorary "hood pass", after he's been proven to be a fornicating liar is a slap in the face to black men. (And then there is Andrew Young's comment that Bill is blacker than Obama and has probably slept with more black women--don't even get me started on that one-WOW!)
You've got to understand that there are some folks out there that don't even bother to read into the deeper meaning behind these things....these are the people that AB is talking about. Unfortunately, these same folk will probably never read this blog.

beantwn chick said...

okay crazy thing, I live in Las Vegas and went to See Barack Obama speak, I was shocked to see white ppl at the rally supporting him. Las Vegas is considered the Mississippi of the west. I'm wondering what our Hispanic brethern are going to do with their vote, they never stand with us.

cinco said...

I watched Hiliary on Meet the Press- she had a lot to say about 'Obama', yet very little to say about what she plans to do. I've yet to be informed about the great things Hiliary has done for the 'Blacks' in New York...neither can I recall how 'Bills' ' terms greatly influenced the Black community. BTW...news channels today had the audacity to allow BET founder speak for Hiliary and against Barack...if what BET represents is an example of how any educated, well informed Blacks believe-she should drop him like a hot potato. The BET network programing is proof enough of how little 'they' want to understand. ..snd she would be destined to lose.

cube said...

I saw Hillary on Meet The Press too. Man, you gotta give her this: that woman is real good at serving up BS answers and deflecting questions, especially the one about the drug dealer accusation. She is slick, just like her husband. I have no doubt that the crying was a staged ploy , and it worked.

America is really, really dumb, most people can't artulate candidates stances because they get caught up on superficial Bullshit. The clintons know this better than anyone, and I think this excessive pandering is why Hillary will ultimately win.

Obama needs to stop hoping and go on the offensive. Now!

cinco said...

I too wish Barack was more verbally aggressive. But I also believe if he showed this 'attitude' now it might work against him. It wouldn't take long for someone to say how 'threatening' or 'mud slinging' he had become. I'm not sure if that 'misinterpretation' would be a result of his 'blackness', his 'gender', or the two combined. Perhaps he should endure the 'taunting' until he's nominated to face the Republican's choice. I think at that time any 'strong' attacks would be perceived as 'fair game'.

CAB said...

Alright, zackattack, like Mr. Freeze would say, "Just CHILL". No one's disrespecting your opinion just because they don't agree. It sounds much like I was and still can be at times, where one gets too invested in their political opinion and gets defensive to the point of attacking anyone who utters any disagreement with them.

I agree that Senator Obama, as a constituent of his myself, has disappointed me several times as well. To me it's because he's been either unable or unwilling to sway from the party line enough to stand up for either the rights of the minority (and I don't mean the GOP) or against the war in Iraq. The only time I can remember him standing up was to block the nomination of von Spakovsky to the head of the FEC, and that may have had some positive impact on the number of black voters in the upcoming elections but I fear unless the fight is kept strong Bush will or may already have found a time to recess appoint von Spakovsky, making the Senator's stand look frivolous.

Now the important point is that when it came to important leadership at elected posts, NONE of the top candidates has really ever shown up. They've either tried and flopped miserably, shown horrible judgment, or been absent. If one wanted to think about past experiences between candidates, to me it could be summed up as:

HRC (Failed and bad judgment)
vs
Barack Obama (Absent)
vs
John Edwards (Bad judgment)

Who do you want now?

SolShine7 said...

Cool blog. I found you via Racialicious.com

Anonymous said...

I agree with much of what you say. I also disagree. I don't think putting things in layman's terms is "spoon-feeding", but if it is, then maybe that's where we need to start. A lot of people don't understand the language or the process by which things happen. There's some personal responsibility that needs to happen, but it's also the failure of an educational industry designed to inculcate obedience to the state (which would have to include making sure people emerge as dumb as posts, otherwise they get all sorts of nasty leveling impulses to make things "equal.")

How can I not know what the candidates stand for? Why am I undecided? Because I don't believe them. Any of them. I think they're liars. They lie so that you'll vote for them, and then they're just going to do what they want to do or what they *can* do, which could never be enough to make up for generations of disaffected, unempowered, slack-jawed cretins. Because I believe at least one of them has to fall to some scandal (real or contrived). Because it's early. Because no matter who I vote for, there is a strong likelihood of having to run to the toilet and vomit afterward.

Vote for who you want and then let's come together to talk about how we really solve these problems, not the same cycle of blaming the incumbent for the failings of the predecessor (except the current incumbent who is like the devil on crack).

Finally, not everybody has a computer with a nifty hook-up to do all the research. Not everybody, especially not all us ostensibly dumb, lazy, spoon-fed laypeople know which sources of information to trust. I try to imagine my 70-year-old mother paging through links on her 24 bps dial-up to learn more about candidates when I had to teach her how to "Reply" to an email, and I feel embarrassed for my generation who apparently think that the entire world knows what Google is. Can we muster a little compassion and stop letting our anger flow through the keyboard to alienate people who *might* actually agree if you hadn't just insulted them?

zoopath said...

Hi, I've never been to this blog before and I came here from racialicious. I'm an AA woman and at this point I prefer Clinton for the democratic candidate. So when I came her and read the post and some of the comments, it was difficult to get past the very off-putting condescension to understand the actual message. If calling people ignorant by way of laziness and making it seem (at least to me) that an AA not supporting Obama is akin to not knowing the sky is blue is supposed to bring people into the camp good luck with it. It seems to me that the premise is that if you knew Obama's stances, you'd pick Obama. Or that people who don't support Obama are mad that he's not black Jesus. As for "What did Clinton ever do for black people?" question, I'd answer by saying that they didn't turn the country into one big cluster "f" (not to say that Obama, nor anyone could come close to Bush in that arena). I don't expect presidents to "do" things for black people. It would be nice, but we're probably going to have to fix our own problems. I think Obama would do his best job as president in a few more years. My main reasons for liking Hilary is because she is more experienced (as bad as the healthcare plan was I think it was a valuable learning experience) and she knows policy much better than he does (notice I did not say smarter, just more informed on policy). As for civil rights, I'm not concerned about her turning a blind eye to the needs of minorities. Having said that I think the Dems are fortunate to have such relatively good options to choose from and I'd support whoever gets the nomination.

Anonymous said...

zack attack why do you feel everytime like whining oh ppl are attacking me? well my family in New York do not like Hillary, they feel she is an opportunist, who flip flops on the issues. Whatever is popular she'll vote for. So ppl who live in Chicago or New YOrk do not like their Senator, so now what/
And to the AA women above you don't care if she turns a blind eye to our issues? then you must not be effected by crack, oil, or racial profiling, it must be nice

Anonymous said...

affected, sorry

Anonymous said...

Jesus was black, so why call him black Jesus, also there are no J's in his language

zoopath said...

black jesus refers to the messiah reference in the post. To clarify: As for civil rights, I'm not concerned about her turning a blind eye to the needs of minorities. Perhaps I should have said "worried" instead. I don't think that she would turn a blind eye to the needs of minorities. I don't distrust her judgement nor her intentions on the whole with reguard to civil rights. I don't consider myself immune to the effects of crack, oil and racial profiling.

Yusuf said...

the REAL questions: 1. Are Obama's Civil Rights policies really any different than any other democrat? 2.Will Obama continue the Bush doctrine (defender of capitalism/imperialism)?

I say, he wouldn't be at the table if he was trying to make any real changes in the status quo, fake war on terror, imperialist actions, etc. Obama, like everyone else (maybe not Kucinish), will be a corporate President who exploits the working class for the benefit of the plutocracy! He's not getting my vote, I don't vote for my oppressor!

Anonymous said...

I heard what he will do for the jail birds, for the poor blacks, for welfare mothers, but what will he do for hard working non violent whites? that are interested bringing the deficit down, education their kids , college tuition fees, gas prices, housing.....ect...

Anonymous said...

with what you know about Hussein Obama today, would you vote for him if he was white?

Post a Comment

ݬ