There are crazy stories, there are unbelievable stories, and then there's nonsense like this that just completely defies logic.
While arguing that requiring voters to present a photo ID before entering the polls actually discriminates against whites more than blacks, John Tanner, the chief of the Justice Department’s civil rights division dropped the nugget below.
In a speech to a Latino group earlier this month in Los Angeles, Mr. Tanner said that a disproportionate share of elderly minority voters did not have identification, but added that it was not a widespread problem because of their life expectancy.Honestly, I don't really oppose requiring voters to show photo ID before voting, and I really don't understand why the NAACP has been so insistent on tagging this as somehow discriminatory. I mean, c'mon, you have to show a photo ID for darn near everything, why the big fuss over requiring one before voting?
"Creating problems for elderly persons just is not good under any circumstance, Mr. Tanner told the National Latino Congreso, according to a video posted on YouTube. "Of course, that also ties into the racial aspect because our society is such that minorities don’t become elderly the way white people do. They die first."
Still, how damn scary is it that a government official responsible for ensuring voting rights for all citizens harbors such a draconian opinion as the one above? Sure, it's technically true, the life expectancy for minorities is less than for whites. But what in the holy heck does that have to do with ensuring that everyone's vote counts?
Maybe something got lost in translation here, but this looks like another Bill Bennett "open mouth, insert both feet" move. Between this, the explosion of nooses, and the "blacks are genetically dumber" statement from a Nobel Prize winning scientist, I'd say October has hardly been a banner month for Black America. C'mon Halloween. Hurry.
Of course, Barack Obama: Current Mouthpiece Of Black America™, is seizing the moment to
Anyways, peep the video for yourself if you wanna hear everything in context.
Obama Calls for Ouster of Official After Remark [NYTimes]


2 AverageComments™:
Honestly, I don't really oppose requiring voters to show photo ID before voting, and I really don't understand why the NAACP has been so insistent on tagging this as somehow discriminatory. I mean, c'mon, you have to show a photo ID for darn near everything, why the big fuss over requiring one before voting?
Amen to AB on this one. This issue has always been my nominee for the NAACP's grossest violation of the "pick your battles carefully" mantra, and it's a crowded field for sure.
Besides the fact that showing ID in today's world is not the big deal it was a generation ago, or even a decade ago, who are the biggest beneficiaries of the voter fraud resulting from an "honor code" voting system?
Hint: It's neither Average Bro nor Average Sis. Rather, it's the party machines (on both ends of the spectrum) in certain areas with the organization, information, and know-how to match the stooges with the names least likely to make it to the polls on election day.
But if I had to pick one area of the election process where minorities and/or the poor are most disenfranchised, it wouldn't have anything to do with the actual polling place or election day process.
Instead, it would be the absentee ballot process which, coincidently or not, is where most of the fraud seems to occur.
If you are looking at the "typical" absentee voter with the gumption and knowledge to fill out an absentee ballot application, submit it, make sure the actual ballot is received, complete the ballot properly and send it in on time, these "disenfranchised" groups will be even less represented than they are at the polls on election day, with or without proper ID.
Things could always be worse- @ least no inference was made for the elderly to obtain ID from the 'check cashing store'-because without an ID, we know nothing is occuring @ a bank! For the most part, I only see minorities (few@ most), come out to vote for the Presidential elections-anything less doesn't seem as important. As for dying sooner-that doesn't seem to matter when the 'State' or 'Federal' government want what's 'yours'-then I don't believe race is as big of a factor! Most elderly should have a picture ID- based on the 'red tape' process one goes through to obtain government assistance in the first place. It's baffling to me how one ages and has no 'photo ID' to show for it.
Post a Comment